FierceFinanceFierceFinanceITFierceSarbox   FierceCIO
About | Sample | Privacy

Vikram Pandit lashes out in merger mess

Tools
Tags
Robert Steel
merger
Citi
Wells Fargo
Wachovia
Vikram Pandit

Just when you thought that a measure of peace would prevail in the Wachovia-Wells Fargo-Citi mess, Citi CEO Vikram Pandit decides to shake things up. The Financial Times reports that in a "town hall" meeting with Citi's employees, Pandit lashed out at Robert Steel, Wachovia's CEO. Pandit says Steel told him two days before Wells's surprise offer that they had "a deal." Steel went so far as to advise Citi to start raising the $10 billion needed to fund the transaction. There's a sense that Wells may end up with most of the deposits, which would explain why Citi execs would be fuming. Citi of course has sued Wachovia and Wells for up to $60 billion. "We saved Wachovia from collapsing," Pandit reportedly told employees. "We have to be compensated for that. That is like somebody buying a $2 ticket, winning $10...and somebody says, 'I am going to come and steal it away from you for two-and-a-half bucks.'" Some have criticized Citi for actually signing some sort of agreement.

For more:
- here's the FT article

Related Articles:
How the government fares in Wachovia bids
The most Citigroup can hope for

Comments

If Citi doesn't back away the govt should preclude them from participating in the $700B program. Citi is getting govt to limit its losses on Wachovia's bad assets. So taxpayers are helping Citi buy Wachovia cheap while a private sector company (Wells Fargo) is willing to buy without taxpayer money.
CITI BACK OFF

WFC will be using every government tax break and taxpayer subsidized program they can use. They are using taxpayer money. They already said they would use the TARP program and the enhanced tax breaks depriving the treasury of taxes. It is all about money and greed.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

More information about formatting options

What is 27 + 57?
To combat spam, please solve the math question above.