FierceFinanceFierceFinanceITFierceSarbox   FierceCIO
About | Sample | Privacy

Questions linger about the bailout; what about equity?

Tools
Tags
Taxpayers
Credit Crunch
banks
Bailout

There are lots of questions about the massive government bailout plan. You can expect the opposition to crank up their efforts. One of the biggest issues--a potential deal breaker--boils down to what taxpayers get in return for the $700 billion to be used to buy up toxic assets. As of now, there is no provision that would give any equity to the government (and thus taxpayers). That strikes many as a huge blunder. Some have raised the idea of requiring banks to give contingent shares to the government. That would require the value of the contingent shares to equal the value of the assets purchased by the government. That, in turn, would give the government some upside, which strikes some as a good idea. There is precedent: Sweden grappled with a similar crisis by forcing the banks to issue warrants to the government. That really reduced the total costs of the plan.

For more:
- here's an AP article
- here's a New York Times article on Sweden

Related Article:
Once again, people wonder if the worst is finally over

Comments

It is not a bad idea, and Japan also had similar bailout package by forcing banks to issue preferred stocks to the governments with cumulative, arrear dividend requirement, in exchange of government funds.

Bank of Tokyo Mitsuibishi UFJ, Sumitomo & Mitsui Bank, and Mizuho Bank all received funds from government and paid back to the government. The result- after stiff dividend policy and government oversight, Japanese banks learned the lesson of risk management and barely suffer from subprime credit crisis....

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

More information about formatting options

What is 38 + 23?
To combat spam, please solve the math question above.