FierceFinanceFierceFinanceITFierceCompliance IT   FierceCIO

Can you really blame the SEC for Madoff scam?

Tools
Tags
SEC
Ponzi Scheme
Bernie Madoff
Bernard Madoff
Allan Sloan

The SEC is taking some massive punches for its failure to detect the massive Bernard Madoff Ponzi scheme, even after regulators probed the firm no less than eight times over 16 years, according to one WSJ report.

But columnist Allan Sloan suggests that the system is set up this way: "You're likely to get caught if you run a few inches outside the baseline, because regulators are set up to catch that. But run so far out that you're playing on a whole different ball field? You can get away with that if you're enough of a financiopath, and your luck holds." 

Still, it rankles people that after all the tips and aroused suspicions the firm was always cleared. Maybe its true that a dedicated con is less likely to be detected than a mere number-fudger. Do you agree?

For more:
- here's the column via Fortune

Related Articles:
Madoff news from FierceFinance
SEC news from FierceFinance

Comments

Well, it does seem likely that Madoff and company took well informed and effective counter-measures to make sure that they passed the SEC's inspections.

Where did that eight times over 16 years number come from? I don't remember seeing anywhere that the SEC had checked Madoff eight times.

This Wall Street Journal article (http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123111743915052731.html). We'll add the attribition. Thanks for bringing this to our attention.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

More information about formatting options

To combat spam, please enter the code in the image.