Most Popular Stories
Events
Latest News
At banks, traders take losses for the team
April 8, 2008 — 6:59am ET
We all have heard the stories of how some hedge funds hit grand slams by betting against subprime-related mortgages. The New York Post mentions John Paulson's $3 billion take. Wow! But the Post and Traders Monthly also mention that at top banks, a lot of traders also bet correctly but ended up with less in bonuses. The reason: Their banks struggled overall, and that forced some changes in the bonus structure. Normally, you keep a percentage of what you generate. However in these times, some traders, despite great performance, earned less. In essence, they took a bullet for the team.
For more:
- here's the Post article
Related Article:
Are our bonuses safe? Editor's Corner
Be the first to comment
Related Stories
- What's going on with Lehman Brothers?
- The long-term fix for financial crises
- Anatomy of a good deal
- Big banks still seeking hedge fund gold
- Credit crisis hits home for John Paulson painlessly
- Bill Gross to save the economy?
- Is the worst now over? John Paulson may think so
- Can John Paulson do it two years in a row?
- Hedge fund winners fare really well
- Can hedge funds save the economy?
Comments
Post new comment
Sponsored Links
Home
| Subscribe | Advertise | Mobile Edition | RSS |
Privacy
| Site MapTHE FIERCEMARKETS NETWORKFierceFinance | FierceFinanceIT | FierceSarbox | FierceHealthcare | FierceHealthFinance | FierceHealthIT | FierceCIO | FierceCIO:TechWatch | FierceContentManagement | FierceMobileIT | FierceBiotech | FierceBioResearcher | FiercePharma | FierceVaccines | FierceIPTV | FierceOnlineVideo | FierceTelecom | FierceVoIP | FierceBroadbandWireless | FierceDeveloper | FierceMobileContent | FierceWireless | FierceWireless:Europe© 2008 FierceMarkets, Inc. All rights reserved. |
![]() |


